Forensic vs. Logical Collections in E-Discovery: A 2024 Guide

54次阅读
没有评论

Why Collection Methodology Matters Now More Than Ever

With 83% of legal cases relying on digital evidence (2024 Georgetown Law study), collection errors can derail cases. Key drivers:

Privacy Regulations – GDPR, CCPA, and new SEC cybersecurity rules demand forensic defensibility
Hybrid Work Risks – 62% of data leaks originate from BYOD endpoints (Proofpoint 2023)
AI-Generated Evidence – Courts now scrutinize LLM-altered documents


Critical Differences: Forensic vs. Logical Collections

Factor Logical Collection Forensic Collection
Scope Active files visible to OS Bit-for-bit copy (including unallocated space)
Metadata Captured Basic (created/modified dates) Full filesystem artifacts (MFT, journal logs)
Encrypted Data Only accessible files Potential brute-force recovery (EFS, BitLocker)
Workload Impact Minimal disruption Device seizure/imaging required
Ideal Use Cases Routine e-discovery Criminal investigations, IP theft

When to Choose Forensic Collection

1. Criminal or HR Investigations

  • Recover deleted Slack messages (SQLite wal files)
  • Unearth hidden partitions (FTK Imager for LVM volumes)

2. Sophisticated Data Hiding

  • Detect steganography in “normal” JPEGs (Aletheia AI)
  • Analyze $MFT timestomping (MACE attribute tampering)

3. Cloud/NAS Challenges

  • AWS EBS snapshots require forensic imaging to preserve instance states
  • Synology RAID arrays need ddrescue for failed drive recovery

Chain of Custody Gaps

  • Always generate SHA-3 hashes during acquisition
  • Use write-blockers (Tableau TX1 for NVMe drives)

Data Sovereignty Conflicts

  • Microsoft 365 collections may require Geo-boundary filters
  • China PIPL demands on-premise tools for citizen data

Emerging Collection Technologies

🔹 Memory Forensics – Volatility 3 for RAM-only malware
🔹 Progressive Collection – Collect only delta changes after legal hold
🔹 Automated Triage – AI classifiers flag potentially privileged files

“A 2023 Ninth Circuit ruling upheld dismissal of a case where forensic collection wasn’t used for WhatsApp evidence.”

正文完
 0
评论(没有评论)